CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Avian ecology and behaviorAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EFFECTS OF OLFACTORY ATTRIBUTES AND SIZE OF EGG ON RATES OF PREDATION OF ARTIFICIAL GROUND NESTS IN TALLGRASS PRAIRIE

Coppedge, Bryan R., Talent, Larry G., Engle, David M.·2007·The Southwestern Naturalist
DOI 10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52[453:eooaas]2.0.co;2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We examined influence of type of nest, olfactory attributes of nests, and size of egg on rates of predation of artificial ground nests in a tallgrass prairie site in Oklahoma during 1998–1999. Our objective was to investigate the role that odors of nests might play in predation of artificial grassland nests. In the first experiment, using eggs of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) as bait, rates of predation on artificial reed nests purchased commercially were compared to artificial grass nests constructed from on-site vegetation. Rate of predation did not differ between type of nest. A second experiment tested effects of the odor of nests that mimicked presence of an incubating female. Artificial nests baited with eggs of the house sparrow were used with one-half being lined with 25–35 feathers from an adult house sparrow, and half being allocated no feathers. Overall depredation did not differ between these types of nest. In a third experiment, which tested effects of novel odors on predation, artificial nests were baited with either painted or unpainted eggs of the house sparrow. Nests with both types of eggs were depredated heavily (70–75% losses). A final experiment tested effects of size of egg by comparing predation among nests baited with eggs of the house sparrow, northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus), or domestic chicken (Gallus gallus). Nests with eggs of the house sparrow (smaller eggs) were preyed upon significantly more (75% cumulative losses) than nests wi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52[453:eooaas]2.0.co;2

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Bayne E. M., 1999, Journal of Field Ornithology, 70, 1
  2. 10.2307/3809387 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/4003408 · DOI
  4. Davison W. B., 2000, Auk, 117, 147, 10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0147:PRORAA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  5. DeGraaf R. M., 1996, Wilson Bulletin, 108, 535
  6. DeGraaf R. M., 2001, Journal of Field Ornithology, 72, 124, 10.1648/0273-8570-72.1.124 · DOI
  7. Dion N., 2000, Condor, 102, 629, 10.1650/0010-5422(2000)102[0629:IEOVAP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  8. Hamilton R. G., 1996, Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference, 61, 208
  9. 10.2307/3672250 · DOI
  10. Johnson D. H., 1979, Auk, 96, 651
  11. King D. I., 1999, Journal of Field Ornithology, 70, 257
  12. 10.2307/1370209 · DOI
  13. Maier T. J., 2000, Condor, 102, 325, 10.1650/0010-5422(2000)102[0325:POJQVH]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  14. Maier T. J., 2001, Condor, 103, 180, 10.1650/0010-5422(2001)103[0180:DIDBSP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1996.tb04342.x · DOI
  16. 10.2307/1370284 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/1368547 · DOI
  18. 10.2307/1311947 · DOI
  19. 10.1086/285515 · DOI
  20. Martin T. E., 1993, Journal of Field Ornithology, 64, 507
  21. Maxson S. J., 1978, Auk, 95, 582
  22. Mayfield H., 1961, Wilson Bulletin, 73, 255
  23. Mayfield H., 1976, Wilson Bulletin, 87, 456
  24. 10.1890/03-0088 · DOI
  25. Newton J. L., 2001, American Midland Naturalist, 145, 29, 10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145[0029:POANIS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  26. Rangen S. A., 2000, Auk, 117, 136, 10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0136:VAOAOA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  27. Renfrew R. B., 2005, Auk, 122, 618, 10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0618:EABNGB]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  28. Rivers J. W., 2003, Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 106, 40, 10.1660/0022-8443(2003)106[0040:IONCAD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  29. 10.1894/0038-4909(2003)048<0460:DANRMP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  30. 10.2307/3545570 · DOI
  31. Rorhbaugh R. W., 1999, Studies in Avian Biology, 19, 165
  32. Warren K. A., 1999, Prairie Naturalist, 31, 215
  33. Whelan C. J., 1994, Auk, 111, 945, 10.2307/4088826 · DOI
  34. Winter M., 1999, Wilson Bulletin, 111, 515
  35. Winter M., 2000, Condor, 102, 256, 10.1650/0010-5422(2000)102[0256:EFEEOM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  36. Winter M., 2003, Prairie Naturalist, 35, 197
  37. 10.2307/1367348 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Coppedge, B. R., Talent, L. G., & Engle, D. M.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
ORCID
Engle, David M.
Venue
The Southwestern Naturalist
Publisher
Southwestern Association of Naturalists
Published
2007-12
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
453-460
ISSN
0038-4909 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52[453:eooaas]2.0.co;2
OpenAlex
W2149467029
Cited by
6
References
36
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Southwestern Naturalist (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
nest predation, artificial nests, olfactory cues, egg size, Passer domesticus, northern bobwhite, chickens, ground-nesting birds, tallgrass prairie

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EFFECTS OF OLFACTORY ATTRIBUTES AND SIZE OF EGG ON RATES OF PREDATION OF ARTIFICIAL GROUND NESTS IN TALLGRASS PRAIRIE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52%5B453:eooaas%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Coppedge, B. R., Talent, L. G., & Engle, D. M. (2007). EFFECTS OF OLFACTORY ATTRIBUTES AND SIZE OF EGG ON RATES OF PREDATION OF ARTIFICIAL GROUND NESTS IN TALLGRASS PRAIRIE. The Southwestern Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52%5B453%3Aeooaas%5D2.0.co%3B2